Improving Google Ad campaign effectiveness with Context

As the marketer responsible for lead generation in our B to B organization, I work closely with our Sales VPs to keep the dynamic sales team happy with enough quality leads (easy right?). This past year we launched numerous initiatives that generated an impressive growth in the number of leads for our team , more than doubling. But, I really struggled with understanding the effectiveness of our Google Online Ads in North America.

Now, Google does a great job of making you feel good about your spend, no matter how poorly you are doing! It seemed like all I really needed to do was to increase my budget for better results.

Well, in all fairness, sure it is true there are some simple things that really help your Google Quality score. For example, make sure your keyword phrases match your Ad text, and that they both match your landing page text. If you make sure you keep that relevance and matching very high between all three, your Quality score will go up with Google. You can see that displayed in the Ad Dashboard, and the higher the quality and closer to 10, the better. And, the higher the Quality the less Google charges you for the same Ad click.

But, what about the challenge of understanding more about your campaign effectiveness? Which campaigns are resulting in more leads, subscribers, people contacting your sales team, visiting your stores or ending up with something in their check-out cart?

You are spending dollars every day, and in today's online world, we should know what is working and what isn't. It's easy to get lost in 'reletive effectiveness' of Ads, but what really matters is Ads that deliver ROI, in however you measure that for your organization.

Google does supply their Analytics package where you can set up Goals and align them (somewhat clumsily) with your Ads. So it is possible, with enough time, to align your Goals in Google Analytics with your Ad properties.

But what I couldn't learn from the Google Analytics was more context on who was visiting, where else on the site they went, and what organization they came from.

I also wanted to be able to tie together repeat visits from the same vistor, becasue often the conversions where later on in sebsequent visits. I didn't want to miss understanding which valuable first campaign they came in on.

We installed Sitecore's own Online Marketing Suite (OMS) this Spring, and we gained a number of valuable insights into our campaigns previoously missing.

For example, we found that certain online properties where we are advertising were really more valuable than we thought, and others a disaster in real ROI. One publication had a lower click through rate, yet we could see their visitors spent much more time on the site, were from organizations of great interest to our sales teams, downloaded more content and eventually would register to get our premium content. I couldn't get this intel before.

With the OMS, global cookies are retained so visits weeks or months apart are automatically tied together. That let us understand campaigns that were really working, and delivering visitors who returned later on to learn more and join.
We eliminated the costly campaigns that just had a lot of clicks but not the right target audience and actions.

What the OMS delivers me is context. Visitor context. And that makes a huge difference. We realigned our Ad dollars and felt the pleasure of seeing our campaign ROI rise appreciably.